“Where might is right there will be no justice” — Plato

KOOB & MAGOOLAGHAN

LIST OF NOTABLE CASES

PRISONERS’ RIGHTS CASES: A. Reported Cases of Interest

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009) (reversing the decision of the Second Circuit, which denied the motion to dismiss filed by high government officials on grounds of immunity and other defenses). This civil rights action was commenced on behalf of Ehab Elmaghraby, an Egyptian immigrant, and Javaid Iqbal, a Pakistani immigrant, who were both arrested in a federal police sweep of Arab and South Asian Muslin communities in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. The suit challenged the constitutional deprivations and abusive treatment they were subjected to during their subsequent detention by the United States government. See “U.S. Fails to End Suit by Muslims Over Prison Treatment”, N.Y.L.J. Sept. 29, 2005, p.1; “Judges Zero In On Treatment of a Detainee”, N.Y.L.J. Oct. 5, 2006, p.1. Specifically they alleged that FBI officials carried out a discriminatory policy by designating them as a persons “of high interest” in the investigation of the September 11 attacks solely because of their race, religion, or national origin. Owing to this designation they were held in secret in the detention center’s solitary confinement unit under horrific and deplorable conditions for over six months, despite having been cleared of any association with the terrorist attacks. After the high officials were removed from the case, both Mr. Elmaghraby and Mr. Iqbal prevailed, and were awarded damages of $300,000.00 and $265,000.00 respectively. For their work on the case, K&M attorneys Joan Magoolaghan, Alexander Reinert, and Elizabeth Koob were nominated 2006 Trial Lawyer of the Year Finalists by the Trial Lawyers for Public Justice, a national trial advocacy organization. Ashcroft v. Iqbal is one of the most cited cases in the history of United States’ jurisprudence.

Hilton v. Wright, 673 F.3d 120 (2nd Cir. 2012) (affirming award of attorney’s fees, and granting counsel their costs in monitoring the injunctive relief granted to a class of prisoners with Hepatitis C). In this civil rights action inmates with Hepatitis C successfully challenged DOCCS’ policy of denying them treatment because they had not enrolled in, or completed an inpatient substance abuse treatment program. See Hilton v. Wright, No. 9:05-CV-1038, 2008 WL 53670 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2008)

Rindfleish v. Wright, 2010 WL 8522545 (W.D.N.Y. Aug 27, 2010), aff’d 2012 WL 1037681 (W.D.N.Y. Mar, 2012) (adopting the decision of the Magistrate Judge on defendants’ motion for summary judgement). This civil rights case was brought by the mother, father, son, sister, brothers and Estate of Andreas Gustov Rindfleisch IV after Mr. Rindfleisch suffered excruciating pain, became physically deformed, and died at the age of forty-four (44) from a treatable dental abscess. Upon evidence that while confined in solitary he had literally begged for medical care, writing “Emergency, Emergency, Emergency” in a desperate cry for help, and proof that the antibiotics that he needed cost less than $5, the case settled for $1,500,000.00.

Davis v. Cole Hoover, No. 03CV550, 2004 WL 1574649 (W.D.N.Y. June 14, 2004) (denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment). In this civil rights action the plaintiff, an inmate confined at the Bedford Hills Correctional Facility, commenced suit after medical staff members were deliberately indifferent to her serious medical condition, and she was rendered blind. The case settled for $2,750,000.00.

Shariff v. Goord, 235 F.R.D. 563 (W.D.N.Y. 2006) (granting plaintiff’s motion to certify the class of wheelchair-bound inmates who were transported to specialty medical appointments in vans without seatbelts). This action was commenced after Mr. Shariff, who is a paraplegic, was injured when the vehicle in which he was being transported without a seatbelt took a sharp turn at an unsafe speed, and he was propelled out of his chair. Claims were asserted under the Eighth Amendment and under Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and via a 2011 settlement the class succeeded in changing the manner of transport for wheelchair bound inmates to assure their safe transport, and Mr. Shariff was awarded damages in the amount of $95,000.00.

Domenech v. Goord, 20 A.D.3d 416, 797 N.Y.S.2d 313, (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Jul 05, 2005) (decision upholding finding that New York State’s policy of denying treatment for Hepatitis C through requiring treatment for past drug abuse to be unconstitutional deprivation of needed medical care. See Panel Upholds Order to Treat State Inmate, N.Y.L.J. July 11, 2005, p.1.

Tortorici v. Goord, 216 F.R.D. 256 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (decision holding quality assurance documents discoverable). This civil rights action was commenced on behalf of the mother, father, brothers, sister and Estate of Ralph Tortorici after Ralph tragically committed suicide at the age of 31. The case settled for $800,000.00 plus attorneys’ fees in the amount of $375,000.00, upon substantial evidence regarding the systemic deficiencies in the delivery of mental health treatment to inmates who suffer serious psychiatric illnesses, and upon the shocking revelation that Ralph Tortorici was all but abandoned by the mental health practitioners responsible for his treatment and care.

Jackson v. Johnson, 118 F. Supp. 2d 278 (N.D.N.Y. 2000), aff’d in part, appeal dismissed in part, 13 Fed. Appx 51, 2001 WL 735902 (2nd Cir. 2001). This case was a civil rights action on behalf of a 14 year old who, while confined in a medium security youth facility owned and operated by the New York State Division for Youth, was subjected to two violent and unlawful assaults by Youth Division Aides that left him with permanent brain damage and quadriplegia. The case settled on the eve of trial for $9,750,000, the largest award in a civil rights action in the history of the Northern District of New York. See N.Y.L.J., 2/26/02, p.1 (announcing the settlement). One result of the case was a new policy initiated by State Attorney General Eliot L. Spitzer, who ordered the 521 lawyers in his office to terminate their use of race based mortality tables in assessing damages for plaintiffs who sue the State (see NYLJ, 4/21/99, p.1) (announcing the change in policy at the Attorney General’s office). The case also resulted in the implementation of a new Physical Restraint Technique throughout the Division for Youth to assure that another youth would not suffer similar injuries.

Smith v. Goord, 222 F.R.D. 238 (N.D.N.Y. 2004) (decision granting plaintiff discovery of personnel files, and training and job performance documents). This civil rights action was commenced on behalf of a former inmate who suffers from a serious psychiatric illness but was nevertheless housed in solitary confinement under horrific and inhumane conditions, and warehoused without treatment in “mental health” observation cells, under equally appalling conditions. After the District Court granted plaintiff’s motion seeking access to very valuable discovery materials the case settled for $115,000.00 plus attorneys’ fees.

Baker v. Coughlin, et al., 77 F.3d 12 (2nd Cir. 1996) (decision finds N.Y. Corr. L. ‘ 24 a bar to state negligence claims). This was a civil rights action for the death of 18 year old prisoner at a boot camp correctional facility who was subjected to excessive force and the denial of emergency medical treatment. The case settled for $1,000,000 in damages to the deceased’s mother for wrongful death and payment of $300,000 in attorneys fees. Included in the settlement was an agreement for a meeting between the deceased’s mother, the Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services and a Governor’s representative to discuss the problematic use of excessive force in State boot camps. The case resulted in a new training initiative by the Department of Corrections.

Brown v. Coughlin, 758 F. Supp. 876 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) (denial of summary judgment motion), later reported at 869 F. Supp. 196 (S.D.N.Y. 1994). This case was brought for the deliberate indifference of municipal defendants to a prisoner’s need for adequate medical treatment for a simple fracture of the leg, which resulted in a below the knee amputation. The case was settled for $600,000.

D’Angelo v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 929 F. Supp. 129 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) (denial of summary judgment). This civil rights action arose from the August 1982 death of Sonia Yglesias, who at the age of 33 and while in the custody of the City of New York, died approximately 24 hours after her admission to the secure psychiatric unit at Elmhurst Hospital. The action, brought twelve years after her death on the theory that the claims did not accrue and/or were tolled because of a cover up masterminded by the city relating to the cause of death, included claims for loss of the parent child relationship. The case settled for $750,000.

Langley v. Coughlin, 715 F. Supp. 522 (S.D.N.Y. 1989); 709 F. Supp. 482 (S.D.N.Y. 1989), aff’d 888 F.2d 252 (2d Cir. 1989) (decisions denying challenge to class certification, qualified immunity & summary judgment). This was a class action challenge to punitive segregation and the inadequate mental health treatment given mentally ill prisoners. The case settled with an injunction and damage fund of $350,000 for all class members who had been confined in solitary confinement during the relevant period, with additional damages to those prisoners denied mental health care. The case resulted in payment in excess of $900,000 in attorneys fees and $100,000 in costs, primarily for expert witness testimony, awarded as requested. The case led to new protocols for the delivery of mental health services and new protections for prisoners confined to solitary throughout the New York State Department of Correctional Services.

Powell v. Ward, 487 F. Supp. 917 (1980), aff’d as mod. 643 F.2d 924 (1981), cert. den’d, 454 U.S. 832 (1981) (motion on contempt); 540 F. Supp. 515 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) (monitoring of contempt decision); 562 F. Supp. 274 (S.D.N.Y. 1983) (same); sub nom 1993 WL 328837 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d 22 F.3d 1092 (2d Cir.1994) (same); 1994 WL 673507 (S.D.N.Y.) (final attorney’s fees award), aff’d sub nom, 122 F.3d 1057 (2d Cir. 1995). This class action sought contempt and a permanent injunction for violations of due process in prison disciplinary proceedings. A settlement fund was established in the amount of $125,000 in lieu of civil contempt fines. Over $1 million dollars was paid in attorney’s fees in the case, which proceeded over the course of two decades and changed the entire system of disciplinary hearings throughout the New York State Department of Correctional Services and developed the law on civil contempt. Before it concluded, well over 100 Court orders were entered.

Kagan v. State of New York, 221 A.D.2d 7, 646 N.Y.S.2d 336 (2nd Dept. 1996). This case was commenced after claimant, an inmate at the Bedford Hills Correctional Facility, lost her hearing in one ear because of the prison’s negligent provision of medical care. After trial, a judge in the Court of Claims awarded $304,000 to our client. See $304,000 “Negligence Award Won by Inmate Rendered Deaf”, NYLJ, 8/3/92, p.1. The award was affirmed on appeal.

McCormick v. Gray, 1993 WL 437788 (S.D.N.Y.). This case was a challenge to the State’s attempt to prevent a husband and wife from residing together after both were released from prison. After our law firm successfully challenged the policy, the District Court awarded attorneys’ fees in full.

PRISONERS’ RIGHTS CASES: B. Unreported Decisions & Settlements

Hicks v. The City of New York, et.al., 15 Civ. 4888 (S.D.N.Y.). This civil rights case was commenced on behalf of Tyrone Hicks, a veteran, honorably discharged from the Naval Services, with a history of serious psychiatric ailments who spent seven years in New York State correctional institutions wrongfully convicted of attempted rape, assault and attempted sodomy. Because he was not exonerated until 2014, he was forced to register quarterly as a sexual offender for five years after his release from prison. We co-counseled with Adele Bernhard, Esq., who litigated his exoneration case, in his claim for damages for his wrongful conviction.  Mr. Hicks settled the action for $3,250,000.

Pattiasina v Sewalt, 12 Civ. 6170 (W.D.N.Y.). Plaintiff Richard Pattiasina commenced suit because he suffered a fractured testicle after he was pushed to the ground and violently kicked in the groin by a correction officer without cause or justification, and because the nurses at the facility evidenced such deliberate indifference to his serious, emergent, medical condition that he remained helpless and in excruciating pain for over seven (7) days while he was denied any treatment whatsoever. After extensive discovery the action settled for $800,000.00, one of the largest amounts awarded in an excessive force case against NYS for a plaintiff who was confined under DOCCS’ custody at the time the case concluded.

Moss v. City of New York, 05 Civ. 7420 (S.D.N.Y.). Plaintiff family members brought suit claiming that due to the defendants’ deliberate indifference and reckless and callous disregard to four attempts made by David Pennington to obtain mental health treatment over a seventy-two hour period, David committed suicide hanged at the age of 27 while being detained under custody of the New York City Department of Corrections. The family settled the action for $940,000 plus payment of attorneys fees of $140,000.

Pulver v. Goord, 05-CV-462 (N.D.N.Y.). This civil rights action was commenced by the children of Paul Edward Lagoe, Jr., an inmate who was denied treatment of his serious mental illness and committed suicide at the age of 22 while confined in solitary confinement at the Southport Correctional Facility. The settlement of $1,200,000 for damages and fees was the largest prisoner suicide award in this state.

Morgan v. Koenigsmann, 03-Civ-3937 (S.D.N.Y.) This civil rights action was commenced on behalf of an inmate for damages resulting from the unconstitutional denial of treatment for his Hepatitis C infection. The matter settled on the eve of trial for $225,000.00 for damages and $98,000.00 in attorney’s fees and costs.

Almodovar v. Andrews, 00-CV-0599 (W.D.N.Y.) This civil rights action was commenced after Sarah Almodovar was brutally assaulted by correction officers because she cooperated in an investigation conducted by the Inspector General’s office into sexual harassment by guards at the Albion Correctional Facility. After months of pre-trial discovery, the case settled for $135,000.00.

Rosado v. Graceffo, 99-Civ.-551 (W.D.N.Y.) This civil rights action was commenced on behalf of an inmate who was denied medical treatment for a painful and disfiguring dermatological condition which grotesquely scarred his face and body, thus subjecting him to continuous ridicule during his period of incarceration. After appropriate treatment was obtained, a settlement was reached in the amount of $139,241, including attorney’s fees of $49,241.

Battiste v. Artuz, et al., 99 Civ. 0503 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.). This civil rights action arose from the State’s failure to provide a prisoner with adequate psychiatric care for his serious mental illness. As a result, the prisoner committed suicide. The case was settled for $350,000 inclusive of attorneys’ fees.

Gray v. The State of New York, Claim No. 75070 A (N.Y. Ct. Claims). This case was brought in the Court of Claims after a prisoner died because of delayed treatment and diagnosis of colon cancer. The Court of Claims judge awarded $505,000 in 1993 after trial.

Davidson, et al. v. Artuz, et al., 98 Civ. 6019 (JSM) (S.D.N.Y.). This civil rights action arose from the death of a 29 year old prisoner who, while serving lengthy consecutive sentences, suffered from an asthma attack and died as a result of defendants’ refusal to respond to the vociferous pleas for help from the prisoner population. The case, which included claims for loss of companionship for decedent’s mother and three children, settled for $900,000 inclusive of attorneys’ fees.

Morales v. Curley, 93 Civ. 4734 (RPP) (S.D.N.Y.). This case was brought for the wrongful death of a psychiatrically ill prisoner who had been placed in a seclusion cell within a mental health unit without proper medical treatment or review for a two day period and subsequently died from dehydration while in transit to a psychiatric hospital. The case settled at trial for $950,000 to the parents and payment of $100,000 in attorneys’ fees. A complaint filed by counsel post settlement regarding the licensure of the responsible psychologist resulted in the imposition of disciplinary action.

Ortiz v. Stancari, 94 Civ.1685 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y.). In this case, we represented a prisoner who was sodomized and raped by another prisoner known to officials at Westchester County Jail for his violent propensities. The case settled for a total of $295,000.

Rosario v. Coughlin, 91 Civ. 1664 (KMW) (S.D.N.Y.). This civil rights action was brought on behalf of six prisoner paraplegics for instances of denied or delayed medical care. The case settled prior to expert discovery, prior to any pre trial order, and without the expense of defending any dispositive motions by defendant, for total damages of $1,000,000 and $200,000 in attorneys’ fees.

ERISA and DISABILITY RIGHTS CASES

Locher v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, 389 F.3d 288 (2d Cir. 2004) (clarifying standard to be applied by the District Courts in determining whether to consider evidence outside the administrative record). This ERISA litigation was commenced on behalf of a legal secretary who was compelled to resign her position after developing Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. More than a decade after she was first diagnosed, and after prevailing at trial before the Hon. Laura Swain, Ms. Locher was awarded benefits. Locher v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America, 126 F. Supp. 2d 769 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). Because of the importance of the case to the rights of the disabled, the Second Circuit decision was reported on the front page of the New York Law Journal on November 16, 2004, and in follow up articles on ERISA litigation as well. See “Rights of Disability Insurance Claimants Boosted with Decision”, N.Y.L.J., 2/15/2005, p4. Ms. Locher was awarded back benefits with interest and Koob & Magoolaghan was awarded attorneys fees of $268,000.

Noe v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America, U.S.D.C., S.D.N.Y., Dkt. No. 96 Civ. 0177. Plaintiff’s ERISA benefits claim for disability from chronic fatigue syndrome settled with insurer conceding disability and agreeing to coverage and the payment of back benefits. On motion, the Court granted plaintiff interest on his back benefits but not attorneys fees. 1998 WL 80199 (S.D.N.Y., Feb. 24, 1998), aff’d 166 F.3d 14 (2d. Cir. 1998) (unpub’d dec.).

Sansevera v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Inc., 859 F. Supp. 106 (S.D.N.Y., 1994). In this ERISA action on behalf of an individual with chronic fatigue syndrome, the Court awarded back benefits, interest and attorneys’ fees to our client. See “Benefits’ Denial For Disability Held Arbitrary”, N.Y.L.J., 8/8/94, p.1. This was the first reported ERISA case to find claimant with chronic fatigue syndrome entitled to long term disability benefits.

Mermelstein v. NYU Medical Center, 89 Civ. 4003 (MLJ) (S.D.N.Y.). This action for discrimination on the basis of disability, commenced on behalf of a psychiatric resident, was settled pursuant to a confidential stipulation.

Romei v. Shell Oil Company, 1991 WL 692884 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty.) (decision on summary judgement motion). In this disability discrimination case, we represented an employee who alleged that Shell Oil discriminated against him based upon the belief that the plaintiff had AIDS. In 1994 a jury awarded plaintiff compensatory and punitive damages in the amount of $121,000.

Burke v. Lord & Taylor, (S.D.N.Y.). This civil rights action challenged plaintiff’s termination on the ground that defendant had discriminated against him because he had AIDS. After the Court denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, a confidential settlement was reached.

Woodley v. Macy’s, (S.D.N.Y.). This case involved a Macy’s employee who annually played Santa Clause, but who was denied re-employment after he disclosed that he was taking AZT. A confidential settlement was negotiated in 1995 by the Hon. Mario Cuomo, who was appointed to mediate the case by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. See “A Bittersweet Visit By an Ailing Santa: An AIDS Patient Dusts Off His Costume, and His Lawsuit”, New York Times, 12/16/94, p. B1.

Hammonds v. Schweiker, 535 F. Supp. 276 (S.D.N.Y. 1982); 652 F. Supp. 491 (S.D.N.Y. 1987). In this case, we successfully sought social security survivor’s benefits for an “illegitimate” child. See “Teenager In 10 Year Battle Over Child Benefits”, NYLJ, 2/3/97, p.1.

*Additional disability cases involving Eighth Amendment claims can be found under the listing of Prisoner’s Rights Cases (including Morgan, Rosario, Domenech, Smith, Purnell, Tortoricci, Morales, and Moss).

OTHER EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES

Petrovits v. New York City Transit Authority, 2003 WL 22349676 (S.D.N.Y.) (denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict); 2004 WL 42258 (granting attorneys’ fees). This sex discrimination case was tried over six days, and resulted in a jury finding that Joan Petrovits was denied a promotion due to her sex. The jury awarded Ms. Petrovits $150,000.00 in compensatory damages, and Magistrate Judge Eaton thereafter entered an Order compelling the defendants to promote her, awarding back pay, and awarding attorneys’ fees to Koob & Magoolaghan and our trial co counsel, the New York University Civil Rights Clinic.

Pfeiffer v. Lewis County, 308 F. Supp. 2d 88 (N.D.N.Y. 2004) (denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment). This case was litigated on behalf of the only woman ever employed in the Lewis County Sheriff’s Department in a supervisory position after she was demoted from her position as Dispatch Supervisor and denied equal terms and conditions of employment due to her sex. After we defeated the County’s motion for summary judgment the case settled very favorably for an undisclosed amount.

Hernandez, et al. v. Cite, et al., 03 Civ. 8822 (S.D.N.Y.); Anzures, et al. v. Park Avenue Café, et al., 04 Civ. 2993 (S.D.N.Y.); Baizan et al v. Cite Restaurant et al., 04 Civ. 10134 (S.D.N.Y.): These civil rights lawsuits were commenced on behalf of 23 restaurant workers who alleged that they were underpaid in violation of federal and state wage and hour laws, and, in some cases, discriminated against due to their race while working at two fashionable Manhattan restaurants, Cité and Park Avenue Café, managed by Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group. Represented by the Urban Justice Center, the CUNY Law School Immigrant Rights Clinic, and Koob & Magoolaghan, the workers settled their claims in exchange for financial compensation and changes in workplace policies and procedures.

Karibian v. Columbia University, 812 F. Supp. 413 (S.D.N.Y. 1993), rev’d 14 F.3d 773 (2nd Cir. 1994), cert denied 512 U.S. 1213, 114 S. CT. 2693. This lawsuit was brought under Title VII against university and supervisors for sexual harassment. The District Court held that a discrimination plaintiff who submits to her employer’s demands for sexual favors can never recover in a sexual harassment suit. The Second Circuit reversed, noting that such a rule would have the effect of rewarding the most successful harassers, and in doing so announced a new, liberal theory of liability in instances where harassment is by supervisors. The decision resulted in amendments to the EEOC guidelines in such cases. See NYLJ, 2/26/94 p.1 (“The Second Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday announced a new liberal theory of employer liability for a supervisor’s sexual harassment of an employee. . . [e]mployers are liable for abusive work environment if the supervisor uses his actual or apparent authority to further the harassment . . . complainants in such circumstances need not show an employer’s failure to respond to a complaint or no reasonable avenue for complaints”). After a jury verdict for plaintiff of $450,000, the District Court granted judgment n.o.v. to defendants.

Goordineer v. Greenville Board of Fire Commissioners, 234 A.D2d 371, 651 N.Y.S.2d 92 (2d Dept. 1996), leave to appeal denied, 89 N.Y.2d 812, 657 N.Y.S.2d 405 (1997) (finding plaintiff’s complaint timely because of “continuing nature” of discrimination), after remand, 277 A.D.2d 314, 716 N.Y.S.2d 685 (2d Dept. 2000) leave to appeal dismissed, 96 N.Y.2d 792, 725 N.Y.S.2d 642 (2001) (successfully defending challenges NYS Division of Human Rights’ decision finding plaintiff, a decorated volunteer fire fighter, had been discriminated against on the basis of her sex in her application for work as a full time paid fire fighter). The case was resolved by a confidential settlement.

OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS CASES

The Mount Kisco Worker’s Project v. The Village/Town of Mount Kisco, 96 Civ. 8335 (BDP) (S.D.N.Y.). This class action was brought on behalf of the day laborers of Mount Kisco who successfully challenged the Village’s mandatory hiring site for day laborers, the midnight housing raids conducted on Latino homes, and the summary eviction of Latinos from the public park as violative of their rights under the First Amendment and the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the U.S. Constitution. Years later, plaintiffs successfully prevailed on a motion to hold the defendants in contempt of the Consent Decree entered in the case.

Melchor v. The Village/Town of Mount Kisco, 97 Civ. 0010 (BDP) (S.D.N.Y.). This civil rights action was brought on behalf of eleven Latinos who were summarily ejected from their home during an illegal housing raid, not allowed to re enter for a period of seven hours, and subjected to criminal prosecution. The criminal charges against our clients were either withdrawn or dismissed, and in the civil rights action, damages were awarded to each plaintiff in the amount of $20,000.

Stern v. Resnick, 99 Civ. 10053 (CM) (S.D.N.Y.). In this case, a preliminary injunction was granted against a landlord who, at the request and support of the Village of Mount Kisco, sought to evict the owner of a Chinese restaurant who had altered her menu to attract a Latino clientele. The case resulted in a confidential settlement.

Ramos v. New York City, 05 Civ. 637 (S.D.N.Y.). This civil rights action was commenced after seventeen (17) year old Jose Ramos was handcuffed and arrested by a security officer at the New York City public high school he attended because of the officer’s unlawful animus against Jose due to his sexual preference. Not long after the litigation was commenced, the courage of this young man was rewarded when the city agreed to compensate him in the amount of $12,500 for the harm suffered as the result of the officer’s actions.

Keep calm and carry on